Newton Executed: No relief from negligence
compiled from The Austin Chronicle
published: 30 March 2008
Updates on this case will be listed at the foot of this item
On Wednesday 14 September 2005, Frances Newton became the third woman to die in Texas’ death chamber since executions resumed in 1982, and the first black woman to be executed in the state since the Civil War.
She was executed despite considerable evidence of prosecutorial negligence, inadequate defence, and recent documentation of evidence lost or suppressed during the original prosecution. On Wednesday afternoon, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected Newton’s final appeal (unanimously and without comment).
On Monday, the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles voted 7-0 to deny clemency to Newton, who was convicted of the 1987 murder of her husband and two young children. The board’s refusal was echoed by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the federal district court for the Southern District of Texas, and the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The string of refusals – and most significantly the denial of clemency by the BPP, whose authority is not limited by any rigidly defined statutory scheme – was astounding considering the gravity of new evidence that Newton’s attorneys proffered in recent weeks, which appears to support the long-standing suspicion that Houston sheriff’s investigators recovered multiple firearms in connection with the April 1987 triple murder – despite prosecutorial insistence that a single weapon was seized during the investigation.
In August, Newton’s attorney David Dow, director of the Texas Innocence Network at the University of Houston Law Center, filed an addendum to Newton’s clemency petition citing investigators’ assertions that at least two identical 25-caliber Raven Arms guns had been recovered in connection with the crime.
Although this specific information had never before been corroborated, the CCA denied Newton’s final appeal based on its opinion that the recent revelations were somehow old news. The BPP’s denial is perhaps the most astounding, because the board voted to recommend (and Gov. Rick Perry granted) Newton a 120-day reprieve in December in order to allow time for further testing of suspect evidence used against her at trial.
But rather than put to rest doubts about Newton’s guilt, the resumed investigation actually generated additional, critical questions about the conduct of investigators and prosecutors, leading many legal observers to conclude that the board would again agree she should not be killed while a storm cloud of doubt still threatened the case.
Apparently those who thought the board had the capacity for clear and compassionate reasoning was wrong. (For more on the case, see “Without Evidence: Executing Frances Newton,” Sept. 9.)
Frances Newton Executed In Texas
14 September 2005
Fight to stop Texas woman’s execution
26 August 2005
Woman’s Texas death row reprieve
2 December 2004
Cases recently added to our website. Please note: Not all cases are recent. We are continuously addi... Read more