source: The Guardian
published: 1 July 2021
Public health bodies, charities and the families of men who died after being restrained by police have condemned the inclusion of a controversial medical term in one of the UK’s leading medical handbooks.
Acute behavioural disturbance (ABD), more commonly known as “excited delirium”, a contentious expression used in fatal cases of police violence, has recently been added to the Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines (MPG).
The term, which divides the medical community, was recently mentioned in the trial of Derek Chauvin, the former US police officer found guilty of the murder of George Floyd, although it was not a key part of the evidence.
It has been argued that the term carries racial biases and is often used to justify lethal use of force by police, disproportionately against black men. It has previously been used in many court cases to describe individuals who become agitated or distressed after using drugs or during a mental health episode. In some instances, those described as experiencing “excited delirium” are perceived to exhibit higher pain thresholds and unusual levels of strength.
Nadeem Khan: A case of excited delirium?
It was a mid-summer morning in 2007 in the unremarkable town of Brierfield in Lancashire when 28 year old Nadeem Khan popped out to get a pint of milk for his partner. But something went tragically wrong. He ended up smashing car windows. The police were called. A violent struggle with the police followed. Read more >
Dying of Excitement
When Natasha McKenna was in police custody at the Fairfax County, Virginia, jail in February, the mentally ill woman was restrained by six deputies who, unable to subdue her, shocked her with a Taser. She died several days later. Read more >
Death by Excited Delirium: Diagnosis or Cover up?
You may not have heard of it, but police departments and medical examiners are using a new term to explain why some people suddenly die in police custody. It’s a controversial diagnosis called excited delirium. But the question for many civil liberties groups is, does it really exist? Read more >